Purdue University >
College of Education >
Curriculum & Instruction >
JoAnn
Phillion
> EDCI 205
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Curriculum and
|
|
|
|
|
Syllabus |
Instructors |
Course Policies |
Readings |
Writing |
Schedule |
|
An important link to explore is Teacher Education at Purdue, which will inform you of requirements in the teacher education program. In addition, this page contains useful links regarding teaching accreditation and standards required in the profession.
Course Syllabus
This course
syllabus is available only on the web. It details the purpose, policies,
assignments, readings, and projects of the course.
Purpose:
The purpose of
this course is to provide students with experiences that will assist them in
making informed career choices and build a foundation for future education
courses. The course is designed to help students explore four questions:
The course
is designed to assist students in thinking about what it means to learn to teach
as they reflect on why, whom, and how they will teach.
Rationale:
One role of teacher preparation is to move learners
from a student perspective to a teacher perspective through the examination of
teaching, learning, and schools. Throughout this process students of teaching
clarify, refine, and apply their personal theories of teaching and learning in
classroom contexts. Teaching is a complex activity in which teachers apply
knowledge from multiple subject matter domains and from personal and
professional experience to develop curriculum, enact instruction, and assess
learning. Learning to teach is a lifelong process. Exploring Teaching as a
Career provides the context for the formal beginning of career-long
development.
Purchase the following materials:
COURSE PACKET:
TEACHER NARRATIVES:
1) Esquith, R. (2003). There are no shortcuts here. New York: Anchor
Books.
2) Paley, V.G. (1989). White teacher.
3) Schultz, B. D. (2008) Spectacular things happen along the way: Lessons
from an urban classroom. New York: Teachers College.
REFERENCE TEXT:
Maimon, E. & Peritz, J. (2007). Writing intensive:
Essentials for college writers. New York: McGraw Hill.
* This text is used in both Block I courses and in other courses of the Teacher
Education Program.
Syllabus |
instructors |
Course Policies
|
Readings |
Writing |
Schedule
Projects
1
2
3
4|
Web Assignment 1
2
3 |
Field Experience
|
Professors and Instructors |
E-mail |
Office
Phone |
Office in BRNG |
|
Dr. JoAnn Phillion (coordinator) |
42352 |
4144 |
|
| Ms. Inna Abramova |
63026 |
4135 |
|
| Ms. Genevieve Aglazor |
63027 |
4163 |
|
| Ms. Asta Balkuté |
63023 |
4127 |
|
| Ms. Susan Gran |
63023 |
4127 |
|
| Ms. Ratna Mehta |
63028 |
4169 |
|
| Ms. Eloisa Rodriguez |
63027 |
4163 |
|
| Ms. Suniti Sharma |
63024 |
4129 |
|
| Ms. Sara Solorzano |
63030 |
4178 |
|
| Mr. Yuxiang Wang |
66908 |
4161 |
Syllabus |
Instructors |
Course Policies
|
Readings |
Writing |
Schedule
Projects
1
2
3
4 |
Web Assignment 1
2
3 |
Field Experience
Academic Honesty
The instructors of this course expect, and will enforce, a strict policy of academic honesty. Students who engage in cheating, plagiarism (from books, articles, the Internet, etc.), representing another student's work as one's own, knowingly furnishing false information to the instructor or university, or other forms of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade in this course. Purdue prohibits "dishonesty in connection with any University activity. Cheating, plagiarism, or knowingly furnishing false information to the University are examples of dishonesty." [Part 5, Section III-B-2-a, University Regulations <http://www.purdue.edu/univregs/> ] Furthermore, the University Senate has stipulated that "the commitment of acts of cheating, lying, and deceit in any of their diverse forms (such as the use of substitutes for taking examinations, the use of illegal cribs, plagiarism, and copying during examinations) is dishonest and must not be tolerated. Moreover, knowingly to aid and abet, directly or indirectly, other parties in committing dishonest acts is in itself dishonest." [University Senate Document 72-18, December 15, 1972]
In the event of a major campus emergency, course requirements, deadlines and grading percentages are subject to changes that may be necessitated by a revised semester calendar or other circumstances. Check this web site for information, or contact the coordinator at phillion@purdue.edu, or 494-2352. You will find good information about safety on the Purdue Police Web site: http://www.purdue.edu/police.
Students are required to visit http://www.education.purdue.edu/ODFD/resources.html review the response procedures for emergencies in Beering Hall. It is necessary that you review these directions within the first week of your Beering classes. If you have any questions please see your instructor.
Students with Disabilities
Students with disabilities must be registered with Adaptive Programs, Office of the Dean of Students, before classroom accommodations can be provided. If you are eligible for academic accommodations because you have a documented disability that will impact your work in this class, please schedule an appointment with your instructor as soon as possible to discuss your needs.
Attendance
1) General Purdue Policy: Purdue University policy states that all students are expected to be present for every meeting of classes in which they are enrolled. All matters relative to attendance, including the make-up of missed work, are to be arranged between you and the instructor. Only the instructor can excuse you from classes or course responsibilities. In the case of an illness, accident, or an emergency, you should make direct contact with your instructor as soon as possible, preferably before the class. If the instructor cannot be reached directly a message should be left in the instructor’s department mailbox or email. If you will be absent for more than five days, have not been able to reach the instructor in person or by telephone or through email, you or your representative should notify the Office of the Dean of Students (765-494-1254) as soon as possible after becoming aware that the absence is necessary. Be advised, you may be asked to provide documentation from an authorized professional or agency which supports an explanation for your absence.
2) Specific EDCI 205 Policy: If you complete fewer than eight visits to your assigned school, or if your teacher fails you
in the field experience, you risk a failing grade for
the course. Any unexcused absences from the field experience could result
in a student receiving a Dispositions
Document. You should attend each consecutive week except during Purdue
or school breaks. You must inform your teacher of the Purdue schedule. If you complete fewer than
fourteen campus-based class meetings you will lose 50 points for each
unexcused absence. You are required
to provide official documentation for each missed class
3) School Cancellations/Absences from School :School delays or cancellations may postpone a scheduled school visit. You are expected to make up the day you missed. If you are unable to attend the school for any reason, it is your responsibility to call the school and leave a message for your teacher and email the teacher. Also, you are required to email your 205 instructor immediately about the missed field experience.
Elementary Education Course Completion Policy
Elementary Education majors have two opportunities to enroll in and pass required EDCI, EDPS, and EDST courses with a minimum grade of C. Withdrawal from a course (W or WF) constitutes one of the two opportunities. Failure to successfully meet these requirements will result in dismissal from the Elementary Education Program. Courses repeated to improve a grade must be taken at the West Lafayette campus. [Approved by the Elementary Teacher Education Committee, April 20, 2007.]
Listen to WBAA 920 AM for school delays and closings.
School phone numbers | Block I TiP Syllabus
*******************************************************************************************************************************
Grading: The field experience is pass/fail. If you
fail the field experience, then you may fail EDCI 205. If you pass the field
experience, then your overall grade is dependent on how well you do in the
campus-based portion of the class. There are a total of 1000 points
associated with the campus-based portion of this course. These points are
distributed as follows:
|
Class Participation* (see evaluation rubric below) |
150 |
|
Assignments |
120 |
|
Project 1: Educational Autobiography |
200 |
|
Project 2: Journals |
120 |
|
Project 3: Educational Philosophy |
250 |
|
Project 4: Taskstream Portfolio Artifact ** |
+ 160 |
|
Total |
1000 |
Late assignments may be subject to a penalty of up
to 10% per day.
Your final grade is
determined according to the distribution chart shown below:
|
A+ |
A |
A- |
B+ |
B |
B- |
C+ |
C |
C- |
D+ |
D |
D- |
F |
|
970-1000 |
940-969 |
900-939 |
870-899 |
840-869 |
800-839 |
770-799 |
740-769 |
700-739 |
670-699 |
640-669 |
600-639 |
0-599 |
*
Participation Rubric (Full participation means that you address issues, raise
questions, and actively contribute to whole class and small group sessions.)
|
<110 |
110-119 |
120-129 |
130-139 |
140-150 |
|
Student is generally passively involved and rarely contributes to conversations in class. |
Student expresses ideas on occasion but does not make an attempt to remain actively involved in advancing peers’ thinking and learning. Volunteers to make connections on rare occasions.
|
Student makes conscious efforts to be involved in conversations and discussions in each class session in which there is an opportunity to do so. Talk includes frequent expression of ideas and connections. Active involvement encourages other students’ thinking and new learning. |
Student engages others in conversations and learning. Makes connections that are notable on many occasions. Contributions are meaningful and connect other students’ ideas, texts, and related learning. Uses opportunities to actively generate questions for knowledge construction. |
Student always contributes to class discussions and begins to enhance conversations by contributing to new and deeper level learning, to text connections and to understanding field experiences. The student is articulate and fully engaged. Uses multiple opportunities for thinking aloud and generating questions for further learning. |
Please note that your instructor may/may not use this rubric to evaluate your participation in the class. You may also use this rubric as a self evaluation of your own participation.
** The Taskstream eportfolio assignment must be completed in order to pass the course. Failure to
satisfactorily complete this assignment results in an "F" in the course and the inability
to continue in teacher education.
All Purdue teacher education programs use the commercial electronic portfolio system from Taskstream for storage and assessment of portfolio assignments. This requires students to purchase a software license to use Taskstream in order to complete course work and obtain a teaching license. For more information, please see the following PDF document, which provides a Q&A for students:
Syllabus |
Instructors |
Course Policies |
Readings |
Writing |
Schedule
Projects
1
2
3
4 |
Web Assignment 1
2
3 |
Field Experience
Reading List
AAEE Job Search Handbook. (1998). Evaluate the job market: Put AAEE research to work.
Campbell, D. M. (1997).
How to develop a professional portfolio: A manual for teachers.
Esquith, R. (2003). There are no shortcuts here. New York: Anchor Books.
Fox, C. & Metzger, M. (1985). Two teachers of letters. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4),
pp 349-354.
Kantrowitz,
B. (2001).
A year in the life. Newsweek, pp 42-48.
Keene, M.N. &
Adams, K.H. Easy access: The reference handbook for writers. McGraw-Hill.
Kozol,
J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in
Looking and
Listening: Gathering external information using ethnographic research
techniques.
Miller, P.C. & Endo H. (2004). Understanding and meeting the needs of ESL
students. Phi Delta Kappan, 85 (10), 786-791.
Paley, V.G. (1989).
White Teacher.
Parkay
& Stanford. (1998). Becoming a Teacher.
Phillion,
J. (2002). Excerpts from: Classroom stories of multicultural teaching and
learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34 (3), 281-300.
Silverman & Welty-Lyon.
(1992). Case study: Mary Ewing. McGraw-Hill Inc.
There may be additional readings selected by the course instructor. In addition, you may be requested to search for materials on the Web or in the library.
Films used in the class:
Guggenheim, D. & Schachter, J.(Producers)
& Guggenheim, D. (Director). (2001). The first year. [Film]
(Available from PBS Video, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 2231.)
Hayden, J. & Cauthen, K (Producers) & Hayden, J. (Director). (1996). Children
in America’s schools with Bill Moyers. [Film}
(Available from South Carolina ETV Network, P O Box 11000, Columbia, SC 29211.)
Lavoie, R. (Presenter). (1990). How difficult can this
be? The F.A.T. City Workshop. [Film].
(Available from PBS Video, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 2231.)
Class Discussions of
A major
responsibility that you have in this course is to prepare for class discussion.
Class discussions are based on readings from the three course books (teacher
narratives) and readings from the course packet. Other discussions will come out
of your personal educational experiences and your field experiences. Relevant EDCI 285 readings may also be used in class discussions. This section details
how to prepare for discussions.
The teacher
narratives present stories about real teachers and real schools. They require
you to think about how you might act in similar circumstances. The readings are
relatively short and, on the surface, easy. The Paley book examines the
experiences of a kindergarten teacher. We will discuss this book during
the beginning of the term. The Esquith book examines
the teaching experiences of an award winning teacher. We will discuss this
book during the middle of the term. The Schultz book examines at
the education of middle school students.
The three
narratives have been selected to focus on issues that span elementary through
middle school. To get the most out of these readings, you will need to do
more than simply read. It will be up to you, in your preparation for
discussions, to reflect on the guiding questions of the course, questions posed
by your instructor, and identify problems and possible solutions. Our
discussions will bridge elementary, middle school and secondary perspectives by focusing on
questions that are pertinent to overarching themes. Here are some suggestions to
help you prepare:
Read thoroughly: Start with a quick read to get a general idea of
the main characters, the setting, and the situations. Then read it again, using
the study questions provided as a guide.
Define the Central Issues: Try to understand the problems involved in each
chapter -- both the obvious ones and the more subtle, or hidden problems.
Analyze: Make a list of questions
that you have about how this teacher handled various situations.
Discuss: Discussions are meant to
be open-ended, with no single solution as a goal. You must come to the
discussion prepared to share your thinking. Be prepared to take risks and to
open yourself to other ways of viewing teaching situations. If each participant
prepares in these ways, the discussions will be meaningful and fruitful. It is
your responsibility to help make them so.
Syllabus |
Instructors |
Course Policies
|
Readings |
Writing |
Schedule
Projects
1
2
3
4 |
Web Assignment 1
2
3 |
Field Experience
Journals: You will write a journal entry for each visit to
your school. Each journal entry should consist of a brief record of your
experiences, reflections on those experiences, and reflections on your classroom
readings, writings, and discussions. Number and date each journal
entry (you should have a total equal to the number of visits to the school). The
journal serves as a place to record your reflections and changing
feelings about what it is like to be a teacher. The instructor will read and
respond to each of your journal entries during the semester. Provide a copy of
your journal entry in the form indicated by your course instructor (e mail,
In the journal you keep for this course
you can reflect on the following:
·
A description of the
school and surrounding area.
·
A description of the
classroom: How are seats arranged? What materials are displayed? Is student work
up on the walls?
·
What classroom
routine activities are you performing?
·
What work have you
done with individual students?
·
What small group
and/or large group activities have you engaged in?
·
What lessons have you
assisted the teacher with?
·
Observe one student
and write field notes on observation. Reflect on the field notes.
·
Reflect on
conversations with teacher (see Teacher Interview questions).
·
Reflect on concepts
being discussed in EDCI 285 (gender, race, ethnic, class and other diversity
etc.)
·
Other (Your
instructor may provide additional guided activities for reflection).
The journal you keep in this course serves
three functions:
·
Writing to develop
thinking: Writing helps organize
your thoughts in a way that reading, listening, and speaking do not.
·
Writing for
communicating: Writing helps
communication with instructors
(and perhaps other students): Your journal will be read and responded to by
others. This process of reading and responding should help us all to understand
and communicate better about course content, field experiences, and other
issues.
·
Writing to develop
self-understanding: It is
important for you to think about the process through which you learn to teach.
Your ultimate success as a teacher will depend both on your ability to guide
your learning and your ability to reflect upon the effectiveness of your
teaching.
Assignments:
Week to week assignments
contribute to your growing understanding of education. Being
prepared for class means being ready to discuss new ideas. You will be
asked to search for information (web, library, newspaper, etc.), view films,
read, and write outside of the regular class period. These assignments must be completed in a timely fashion.
Syllabus |
Instructors |
Course Policies |
Readings |
Writing |
Schedule
Projects
1
2
3
4|
Web Assignment 1
2
3 |
Field Experience
There are four project assignments in this
course. The guidelines provided below consist of a question and suggestions on
how to gather information and compose a paper for all four projects.
What do I
write?
Each paper is formulated in terms
of a main question. Address the main question by:
·
reflecting on your
personal experiences, class discussions, field experience observations,
readings, and class assignments, and
·
developing a written response to the main question that draws
on your reflections.
What format
should it be?
Hard copies of the papers should
be typed, double-spaced, and 12 point font. At the top of the first page,
include your name, course number, instructor name, division, and title of paper.
The final eportfolio paper, artifact # 1 for EDCI 205,
should be single spaced. References to course readings or outside texts should
be cited
How will I be evaluated?
Project
1, 3 and 4 will be graded
according to a rubric (project 2 consists of journal entries and will be
responded to by course instructors). A rubric is an assessment tool that lists the evaluation
criteria and relative value given to each. Generally, the rubrics measure
how well you:
·
answered the major
question thoroughly, giving examples and supportive explanations for your
answers;
·
integrated course
readings and experiences into your response; and
·
wrote clearly and professionally, and without mechanical
errors using the guidelines of the
Please note that you can find a list of relevant Standards for each paper at the link below:
INTASC Standards: Click below and go to page 14 http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/corestrd.pdf
Syllabus |
Instructors |
Course Policies |
Readings |
Writing |
Schedule
Projects
1
2
3
4 |
Web Assignment 1
2
3 |
Field Experience
Comments to
phillion@purdue.edu | Last updated
August 2008